Document AMC

« Document 5 1-The title of the document, "Democrats' 'Green New Deal' is a Crazy New Deal that would be a disaster for us all," suggests a strong negative stance towards the Green New Deal proposed by Democratic lawmakers.

The term "crazy" implies that the author finds the proposal irrational or extreme, while "disaster" emphasizes the potential negative consequences the author believes the Green New Deal would bring. 2-Justin Haskins highlights several problems related to the Green New Deal according to his viewpoint: a.

He argues that the plan is economically destructive, suggesting that it would have negative impacts on the economy.

b.

He claims that the plan would raise costs for consumers, wipe out millions of jobs, and potentially lead to a recession or depression, indicating concerns about its potential effects on employment and economic stability.

c. Haskins criticizes the plan for its aim to eliminate fossil fuels within a short timeframe, which he believes would lead to job losses in industries such as oil, natural gas, and coal.

d.

He suggests that the plan's reliance on renewable energy sources would result in higher costs for consumers and businesses, particularly impacting low-income families.

e.

Additionally, Haskins argues that the Green New Deal's mandates for reducing pollution and greenhouse gas emissions from manufacturers and industries would have devastating economic effects, potentially making it difficult for American companies to compete globally. 3-Haskins's tone in the article is strongly critical and disparaging towards the Green New Deal, suggesting a conservative or right-leaning political affiliation.

He uses adjectives such as "radical," "impractical," and "extremist" to describe the plan, conveying a sense of alarm and disbelief.

Verbs such as "suck trillions of dollars," "wipe out millions of jobs," and "plunge our country into a recession" emphasize the perceived negative consequences of the Green New Deal.

Nouns such as "disaster," "self-inflicted wound," and "enormous harm" further underscore his viewpoint that the proposal would be highly detrimental.

This choice of language is likely intended to evoke fear and skepticism in the readers, framing the Green New Deal as a dangerous and reckless policy proposal. Document 6 2-The major shift mentioned by the journalist is that corporate America is increasingly advocating for policies addressing.... »