Neandertals.
Publié le 10/05/2013
Extrait du document
«
Neandertals made stone tools by striking flakes from rock “cores.” The cores were carefully selected and prepared so that only a single blow was normally required todetach a flake.
A number of relatively standardized flakes were sometimes produced from a single core.
These sharp flakes served as “blanks” that were further workedand shaped into the desired tools.
Suitable stone was sometimes rare, and often tools were sharpened and resharpened to make new tools, yielding a whole variety ofshapes and sizes.
Unlike the Cro-Magnons, their modern human successors, Neandertals rarely used bone or antler as materials for tool making.
Neandertals used this same basic toolmaking technology, termed Mousterian by archaeologists, for most of their existence.
However, they later acquired a more advanced toolmaking technology, called Châtelperronian after where it occurred in France , characterized by long, thin stone “blades” and greater use of antler and bone.
At one site, personal decorations made from teeth have been found.
Scientists have debated the earliest dates for Châtelperronian culture.
Most archaeologicalwork has indicated a date of about 35,000 years ago for Châtelperronian artifacts—shortly after the arrival of modern humans in Europe.
This date for Châtelperronianculture led some experts to suggest that Neandertals somehow learned how to make these tools from modern humans, who had a similar technology during this era.
Astudy published in 2006, however, redated the main site in France to 44,000 years ago—thousands of years before modern humans are thought to have reachedEurope.
This revised date would imply that Neandertals likely invented Châtelperronian toolmaking technology independently.
Most experts believe that the Neandertals must have had clothing of some sort in order to survive the climate in Europe, which was at times severely cold.
However,little is known about what type of clothing they wore.
They could have easily made simple skin cloaks by scraping animal hides with stone tools, and they did make boneawls that would have served to pierce hides for binding.
Neandertals never developed perforated bone needles, which would have allowed them to fashion tailored,layered clothing.
Neandertals also controlled fire.
At some Neandertal sites, thick piles of ash and burned rocks attest to years of campfires burning.
No evidence exists that reveals howNeandertals used fire, but it would have provided them with heat, light, and a way to cook food.
VI NEANDERTAL BURIALS AND SYMBOLIC THOUGHT
Neandertals were the first humans known to have buried their dead.
Numerous burial pits have been discovered in the floors of caves and rock shelters, sometimesaccompanied by stone tools or a few animal bones.
At one Neandertal grave, in Shānīd ār Cave in Iraq, large amounts of pollen were discovered, perhaps suggesting aburial with flowers.
A Neandertal child skeleton from Teshik-Tash in the western foothills of the Himalayas lay in a pit surrounded by six pairs of mountain goat horns.
Atmany other burial sites, Neandertal skeletons have their knees and arms drawn close to the chest in a fetal position, possibly but not necessarily indicating a ritual burialposition.
To some authorities, these burials and grave items represent evidence that Neandertals practiced religious rituals, believed in the afterlife, and had the ability to thinksymbolically.
Other experts challenge such interpretations as overly enthusiastic, and offer more mundane explanations.
For example, stone tools and animal boneswere common objects in Neandertal living sites and could have been buried in graves unintentionally, as part of the filling process.
Neandertals may have buried theirdead simply to avoid attracting unwelcome scavengers to their settlements, not because burials held symbolic importance.
The flower pollen found in the Sh ān īd ā r gravecould have been deposited by burrowing rodents.
The possibility that Neandertals used language, a hallmark of symbolic thought, has intrigued researchers for decades.
Some scholars believe the Neandertals had fullyarticulate speech.
Some support for this claim comes from a Neandertal skeleton discovered in Kebara, Israel.
The skeleton still possesses its hyoid bone, a bone situated at the base of the tongue that affects the movement of the larynx, where speech originates.
The Kebara Neandertal hyoid is identical to that of modernhumans, suggesting these people were physically capable of articulate speech.
While some studies of the base of the Neandertal skull suggest the larynx may havebeen positioned too high in the throat to produce articulate speech, the bending of the cranial base in earlier fossils suggests that the ability to produce the sounds ofspeech may have been present in human precursors well before Neandertal times.
Objects with possible symbolic connotations have been discovered at a few Neandertal sites, including pierced animal teeth that may have been used as pendants,incised bone fragments, and a polished plaque made from a mammoth tooth.
Bone and tooth ornaments, including an elegant bone pendant, were found withNeandertal remains at Arcy-sur-Cure in central France.
But the extreme rarity of these objects contrasts sharply with the remarkable abundance of symbolic anddecorative artifacts—such as cave paintings, figurines, carvings, and beads—produced by the Cro-Magnons, the Neandertals’ successors in Europe.
Thus, it seems likelythat Neandertals did not have symbolic thought or language as we know it today, though their intuitive intelligence was probably highly developed.
VII THE ORIGIN OF NEANDERTALS
The earliest fossil evidence for the human occupation of Europe comes from Ceprano in Italy, where a skullcap has been found that is thought to be around 900,000years old.
In the mid-1990s at the Gran Dolina site in the Atapuerca hills of northern Spain, archaeologists unearthed human fossils dated to 780,000 years ago.
TheCeprano specimen has been assigned to its own species Homo cepranensis , and those from the Gran Dolina to the species Homo antecessor or Homo mauritanicus .
Between around 400,000 and 200,000 years ago, some human fossils in Europe show some of the features of Neandertals, but not all of them.
The earliest of thesefossils, dated to around 400,000 years ago, are from the Sima de los Huesos (“Pit of Bones”) cave site at Atapuerca near the much earlier Gran Dolina site.
Thousandsof human bones have been found in a pit in the cave, representing around 30 individuals—more ancient hominid bones collected in one place than found anywhere elsein the world.
These human fossils are contemporaneous with other fossils classified as Homo heidelbergensis .
The Sima hominids are best regarded as the closest known relatives of the Neandertals, and are possibly their ancestors.
VIII NEANDERTALS AND MODERN HUMANS
The Cro-Magnons, a group of early Homo sapiens , entered Europe about 40,000 years ago, a time when Neandertals were the region’s only human inhabitants. Neandertals and modern humans thus coexisted in Europe for more than 10,000 years.
Did Neandertals interbreed with modern humans? Why did the Neandertals dieout around 28,000 years ago while modern humans thrived?
Scientists disagree about whether Neandertals were a distinct species from modern humans.
Largely because Neandertals were big-brained, some paleoanthropologistscontinue to regard them as a version of ourselves.
They classify Neandertals as a subspecies of Homo sapiens —Homo sapiens neanderthalensis— and anatomically modern humans as Homo sapiens sapiens .
According to this school of thought, Neandertals and Cro-Magnons interbred, and anatomically distinctive Neandertal features were simply “swamped” genetically by waves of Cro-Magnons intruding into the Neandertals’ homeland.
If true, some Neandertal genes probably survive todayin modern humans of European descent.
Supporters of interbreeding between Neandertals and modern humans turn to fossil evidence; some late Neandertal fossils are said to look more “modern” than earlierones, and some early moderns are said to have some “Neandertal-like” features.
The claim that these fossils represent evidence of interbreeding is controversial andremains unproven.
At a few sites there is evidence of a short-lived culture that combined Neandertal and Cro-Magnon elements, but this was probably achieved without.
»
↓↓↓ APERÇU DU DOCUMENT ↓↓↓