Biodiversity - biology.
Publié le 11/05/2013
Extrait du document
«
a common molecule, ribonucleic acid (RNA), and most also have deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA).
These molecules direct the production of proteins—molecules responsiblefor the structure and function of virtually all living cells.
This is the evolutionary chain of life.
All species are descended from a single common ancestor.
From that ancient single-celled microbe, all inherited RNA.
As time goesby, species diverge and develop their own peculiar attributes, thus making their own contribution to biodiversity ( see Evolution).
III GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY CRISIS
Most biologists accept the estimate of American evolutionary biologist Edward O.
Wilson that the Earth is losing approximately 27,000 species per year.
This estimate isbased primarily on the rate of disappearance of ecosystems, especially tropical forests and grasslands, and our knowledge of the species that live in such systems.
Wecan measure the rate of loss of tropical rain forests, for example, by analyzing satellite photographs of continents from different periods that show rates and amounts ofhabitat destruction—and from these measurements calculate the approximate number of species being lost each year.
This extraordinary rate of extinction has occurred only five times before in the history of complex life on Earth.
Mass extinctions of the geological past were caused bycatastrophic physical disasters, such as climate changes or meteorite impacts, which destroyed and disrupted ecosystems around the globe.
In the fifth mass extinction,which occurred more than 65 million years ago, the Earth was shrouded in a cloud of atmospheric dust—the result of meteorite impact or widespread volcanic activity.The resulting environmental disruption caused the demise of 76 percent of all species alive at the time, including the dinosaurs.
Today’s sixth extinction is likewiseprimarily caused by ecosystem disturbance—but this time the destroying force is not the physical environment, but rather humankind.
The human transformation of theEarth's surface threatens to be every bit as destructive as any of the past cataclysmic physical disasters.
IV HUMAN IMPACT
The underlying cause of biodiversity loss is the explosion in human population, now at 6 billion, but expected to double again by the year 2050.
The human populationalready consumes nearly half of all the food, crops, medicines, and other useful items produced by the Earth’s organisms, and more than 1 billion people on Earth lackadequate supplies of fresh water ( see World Food Supply).
But the problem is not sheer numbers of people alone: The unequal distribution and consumption of resources and other forms of wealth on the planet must also be considered.
According to some estimates, the average middle-class American consumes an amazing 30times what a person living in a developing nation consumes.
Thus the impact of the 270 million American people must be multiplied by 30 to derive an accuratecomparative estimate of the impact such industrialized nations have on the world's ecosystems.
The single greatest threat to global biodiversity is the human destruction of natural habitats.
Since the invention of agriculture about 10,000 years ago, the humanpopulation has increased from approximately 5 million to a full 6 billion people.
During that time, but especially in the past several centuries, humans have radicallytransformed the face of planet Earth.
The conversion of forests, grasslands, and wetlands for agricultural purposes, coupled with the multiplication and growth of urbancenters and the building of dams and canals, highways, and railways, has physically altered ecosystems to the point that extinction of species has reached its currentalarming pace.
In addition, overexploitation of the world's natural resources, such as fisheries and forests, has greatly outstripped the rate at which these systems can recover.
Forexample, 12 of the 13 largest oceanic fisheries are severely depleted.
Modern fishing techniques, such as using huge fishing nets and bottom vacuuming techniques,remove everything in their paths—including tons of fish and invertebrates of no commercial use.
These victims, as well as porpoises and seals that are also hauled in asaccidental catches, are permanently removed from their populations, significantly altering the ecosystems in which they live.
As human populations have grown, people have spread out to the four corners of the Earth.
In the process, whether on purpose or by accident, they have introducednonnative species that have created ecological nightmares, disrupting local ecosystems and, in many cases, directly driving native species extinct.
For example, thebrown tree snake was introduced to the island of Guam, probably as a stowaway on visiting military cargo ships after World War II (1939-1945).
The snake devastatedthe native bird population, driving over half a dozen native species of birds to extinction—simply because the native birds had not been exposed to this type of predatorand did not recognize the danger posed by these snakes.
V PRESERVING BIODIVERSITY
As the scope and significance of biodiversity loss become better understood, positive steps to stem the tide of the sixth extinction have been proposed and, to someextent, adopted.
Several nations have enacted laws protecting endangered wildlife.
An international treaty known as the Convention on International Trade inEndangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora (CITES) went into effect in 1975 to outlaw the trade of endangered animals and animal parts.
In the United States, theEndangered Species Act (ESA) was enacted in 1973 to protect endangered or threatened species and their habitats.
The Convention on Biological Diversity, held in Riode Janeiro, Brazil, in 1992 and ratified by more than 160 countries, obligates governments to take action to protect plant and animal species.
In the last three decades, focus has shifted away from the preservation of individual species to the protection of large tracts of habitats linked by corridors that enableanimals to move between the habitats.
Thus the movement to save, for example, the spotted owl of the Pacific Northwest, has become an effort to protect vast tractsof old-growth timber ( see National Parks and Preserves).
Promising as these approaches may be, conservation efforts will never succeed in the long run if the local economic needs of people living in and near threatenedecosystems are not taken into account.
This is particularly true in developing countries, where much of the world’s remaining undisturbed land is located.
At the end ofthe 20th century, international organizations such as the World Bank and the World Wildlife Fund launched a movement for all countries in the developing world to setaside 10 percent of their forests in protected areas.
But many communities living near these protected areas have relied on the rain forest for food and firewood forthousands of years.
Left with few economic alternatives, these communities may be left without enough food to eat.
To address this problem, the burgeoning field of conservation biology emphasizes interaction with the people directly impacted by conservation measures.
Conservationbiologists encourage such people to develop sustainable economic alternatives to destructive harvesting and land use.
One alternative is harvesting and sellingrenewable rain forest products, such as vegetable ivory seeds from palms, known as tagua nuts, and brazil nuts.
Where protection measures permit, rain forestcommunities may undertake sustainable rain forest logging operations, in which carefully selected trees are extracted in a way that has minimal impact on the forestecosystem.
Still other communities are exploring medicinal plants for drug development as ways to strengthen and diversify their economies.
Conservation biologists also work with established industries to develop practices that ensure the health and the sustainability of the resources on which they depend.For example, conservation biologists work with fishers to determine how many fish the fishers can harvest without damaging the population and the ecosystem as awhole.
The same principles are applied to the harvesting of trees, plants, animals, and other natural resources.
Preserving biodiversity also takes place at the molecular level in the conservation of genetic diversity.
All around the world efforts are being made to collect andpreserve endangered organisms’ DNA, the molecule that contains their genes.
These collections, or gene banks , may consist of frozen samples of blood or tissue, or in some cases, they may consist of live organisms.
Biologists use gene banks to broaden the gene pool of a species, increasing the likelihood that it will adapt to meet the.
»
↓↓↓ APERÇU DU DOCUMENT ↓↓↓