animism
Publié le 22/02/2012
Extrait du document
Belief in spirits. Strictly speaking, the
term animism refers to a theory about the origin of
religion. The theory is now widely rejected. Some
still use the word to refer to the religious beliefs
and practices of indigenous peoples. But the beliefs
and practices to which animism refers vary widely.
As a result, what animists believe and do must be
determined on a case-by-case basis.
In 1871 the English anthropologist Edward
Burnett Tylor (1832–1917) published an epochmaking
book, Primitive Culture. In it, he developed
the theory that animism—the belief in spirits—was
the origin of religion.
At the time Tylor was writing, many authors
were developing evolutionary theories of religion
(see EVOLUTION AND RELIGION). They assumed that
evolution always moved in one direction: from the
simplest to the most complex forms. Therefore, to
fi nd the origin of religion, all one had to do was
identify its simplest form. Tylor thought he had
found it: the belief in spirits.
Tylor suggested how people fi rst came to
believe in spirits. A corpse is strikingly different
from a living human being. But what makes it different?
Tylor said that "primitives" attributed the
difference to a spirit that animates the body, that
is, that makes the body alive. Tylor also pointed
to the difference between dreaming and waking.
He said that to explain the experience of dreams,
"primitives" hypothesized that the spirit left the
body. Once the idea of spirit was born, it was just
a short step to apply it to the world of nature. Spirits
explained the growth of trees and animals, the
roar of the thunder, anything unusual. Indeed, for
Tylor's "primitives" the whole world was full of
spirits. Tylor buttressed his account with numerous
references to reports about the religion of living
"primitives."
There were, however, competing theories.
The anthropologist R. R. Marett said that there
was a stage even earlier than animism: not
so much belief as emotional awe in the presence
of an impersonal force, something like
religious electricity. Marett called this religion
preanimism or DYNAMISM. Prominent thinkers
like Sigmund FREUD and Émile DURKHEIM picked
up on an idea of W. Robertson Smith. He had
suggested that TOTEMISM was the earliest religion.
James George FRAZER hypothesized that a
stage of MAGIC had preceded religion. Wilhelm
Schmidt said all these theories were wrong. The
first religion had been the belief in a high god,
"primal MONOTHEISM."
There was really no conclusive evidence for
any of these views of religion's origin. Furthermore,
Tylor treated religion as if it were nothing
more than a set of beliefs. As anthropologists
spent time with peoples outside of Europe, they
began to realize that Tylor and others had used
their evidence in crude and misleading ways.
They gave up the search for the origins of religion
and culture and studied contemporary religions
and cultures instead.
But Tylor's infl uence had been enormous.
"Animism" had become a polite term for what people
used to call "paganism," "heathenism," and
"savagery." At the end of the 20th century some
still used the term.