Air Pollution.
Publié le 11/05/2013
Extrait du document
«
Several pollutants attack the ozone layer.
Chief among them is the class of chemicals known as chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs), formerly used as refrigerants (notably in airconditioners), as agents in several manufacturing processes, and as propellants in spray cans.
CFC molecules are virtually indestructible until they reach thestratosphere.
Here, intense ultraviolet radiation breaks the CFC molecules apart, releasing the chlorine atoms they contain.
These chlorine atoms begin reacting withozone, breaking it down into ordinary oxygen molecules that do not absorb UV-B.
The chlorine acts as a catalyst—that is, it takes part in several chemical reactions—yetat the end emerges unchanged and able to react again.
A single chlorine atom can destroy up to 100,000 ozone molecules in the stratosphere.
Other pollutants,including nitrous oxide from fertilizers and the pesticide methyl bromide, also attack atmospheric ozone.
Scientists are finding that under this assault the protective ozone layer in the stratosphere is thinning.
In the Antarctic region, it vanishes almost entirely for a fewweeks every year.
Although CFC use has been greatly reduced in recent years and will soon be prohibited worldwide, CFC molecules already released into the loweratmosphere will be making their way to the stratosphere for decades, and further ozone loss is expected.
As a result, experts anticipate an increase in skin cancers,more cataracts (clouding of the lens of the eye), and reduced yields of some food crops.
B Global Warming
Humans are bringing about another global-scale change in the atmosphere: the increase in what are called greenhouse gases.
Like glass in a greenhouse, these gasesadmit the Sun’s light but tend to reflect back downward the heat that is radiated from the ground below, trapping heat in the Earth’s atmosphere.
This process isknown as the greenhouse effect.
Carbon dioxide is the most significant of these gases—there is 31 percent more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere today than therewas in 1750, the result of our burning coal and fuels derived from oil.
Methane, nitrous oxide, and CFCs are greenhouse gases as well.
Scientists predict that increases in these gases in the atmosphere will make the Earth a warmer place.
They expect a global rise in average temperature of 1.4 to 5.8Celsius degrees (2.5 to 10.4 Fahrenheit degrees) in the next century.
Average temperatures have in fact been rising.
The 1990s were the warmest decade on record,and 2005 was the warmest year on record.
Some scientists are reluctant to say that global warming has actually begun because climate naturally varies from year toyear and decade to decade, and it takes many years of records to be sure of a fundamental change.
There is little disagreement, though, that global warming is on itsway.
Global warming will have different effects in different regions.
A warmed world is expected to have more extreme weather, with more rain during wet periods, longerdroughts, and more powerful storms.
Although the effects of future climate change are unknown, some predict that exaggerated weather conditions may translate intobetter agricultural yields in areas such as the western United States, where temperature and rainfall are expected to increase, while dramatic decreases in rainfall maylead to severe drought and plunging agricultural yields in parts of Africa, for example.
Warmer temperatures are expected to partially melt the polar ice caps, leading to a projected sea level rise of 9 to 100 cm (4 to 40 in) by the year 2100.
A sea levelrise at the upper end of this range would flood coastal cities, force people to abandon low-lying islands, and completely inundate coastal wetlands.
If sea levels rise atprojected rates, the Florida Everglades could be completely under salt water in the next century.
Diseases like malaria, which at present are primarily found in thetropics, may become more common in the regions of the globe between the tropics and the polar regions, called the temperate zones.
For many of the world’s plantspecies, and for animal species that are not easily able to shift their territories as their habitat grows warmer, climate change may bring extinction.
V INDOOR AIR POLLUTION
Pollution is perhaps most harmful at an often unrecognized site—inside the homes and buildings where we spend most of our time.
Indoor pollutants include tobaccosmoke; radon, an invisible radioactive gas that enters homes from the ground in some regions; and chemicals released from synthetic carpets and furniture, pesticides,and household cleaners.
When disturbed, asbestos, a nonflammable material once commonly used in insulation, sheds airborne fibers that can produce a lung diseasecalled asbestosis.
Pollutants may accumulate to reach much higher levels than they do outside, where natural air currents disperse them.
Indoor air levels of many pollutants may be 2 to5 times, and occasionally more than 100 times, higher than outdoor levels.
These levels of indoor air pollutants are especially harmful because people spend as much as90 percent of their time living, working, and playing indoors.
Inefficient or improperly vented heaters are particularly dangerous.
VI POLLUTION CLEANUP AND PREVENTION
In the United States, the serious effort against local and regional air pollution began with the Clean Air Act of 1970, which was amended in 1977 and 1990.
This lawrequires that the air contain no more than specified levels of particulate matter, lead, carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide, nitrogen oxides, volatile organic compounds,ozone, and various toxic substances.
To avoid the mere shifting of pollution from dirty areas to clean ones, stricter standards apply where the air is comparatively clean.In national parks, for instance, the air is supposed to remain as clean as it was when the law was passed.
The act sets deadlines by which standards must be met.
TheEnvironmental Protection Agency (EPA) is in charge of refining and enforcing these standards, but the day-to-day work of fighting pollution falls to the stategovernments and to local air pollution control districts.
Some states, notably California, have imposed tougher air pollution standards of their own.
In an effort to enforce pollution standards, pollution control authorities measure both the amounts of pollutants present in the atmosphere and the amounts entering itfrom certain sources.
The usual approach is to sample the open, or ambient, air and test it for the presence of specified pollutants.
The amount of each pollutant iscounted in parts per million or, in some cases, milligrams or micrograms per cubic meter.
To learn how much pollution is coming from specific sources, measurementsare also taken at industrial smokestacks and automobile tailpipes.
Pollution is controlled in two ways: with end-of-the-pipe devices that capture pollutants already created and by limiting the quantity of pollutants produced in the firstplace.
End-of-the-pipe devices include catalytic converters in automobiles and various kinds of filters and scrubbers in industrial plants.
In a catalytic converter, exhaustgases pass over small beads coated with metals that promote reactions changing harmful substances into less harmful ones.
When end-of-the-pipe devices first beganto be used, they dramatically reduced pollution at a relatively low cost.
As air pollution standards become stricter, it becomes more and more expensive to further cleanthe air.
In order to lower pollution overall, industrial polluters are sometimes allowed to make cooperative deals.
For instance, a power company may fulfill its pollutioncontrol requirements by investing in pollution control at another plant or factory, where more effective pollution control can be accomplished at a lower cost.
End-of-the-pipe controls, however sophisticated, can only do so much.
As pollution efforts evolve, keeping the air clean will depend much more on preventing pollutionthan on curing it.
Gasoline, for instance, has been reformulated several times to achieve cleaner burning.
Various manufacturing processes have been redesigned sothat less waste is produced.
Car manufacturers are experimenting with automobiles that run on electricity or on cleaner-burning fuels.
Buildings are being designed totake advantage of sun in winter and shade and breezes in summer to reduce the need for artificial heating and cooling, which are usually powered by the burning offossil fuels.
The choices people make in their daily lives can have a significant impact on the state of the air.
Using public transportation instead of driving, for instance, reducespollution by limiting the number of pollution-emitting automobiles on the road.
During periods of particularly intense smog, pollution control authorities often urge people.
»
↓↓↓ APERÇU DU DOCUMENT ↓↓↓
Liens utiles
- Pollution de l'air
- pluies acides, phénomène résultant de la pollution de l'air par les oxydes de soufre produits par l'usage de combustibles fossiles riches en soufre, ainsi que par les oxydes d'azote qui se forment lors de toute combustion dans l'atmosphère.
- La Pollution de l'air ambiant.
- 1996 : Une loi contre la pollution de l'air
- La Pollution De L'air